ATTACKS ON SASCO: A GENESIS OF
SOCIETAL DECAY by Malaika Wa Azania
It would
serve the interests of agents of falsification to have students in South Afrika
turn a blind eye to the attacks launched against the South African Students
Congress (SASCO), particularly in this volatile period of our politics where coherent
ideological discourse has been replaced with opportunism, careerism and
patronage. It would serve agents of indoctrination to have students believing
that SASCO is working against us and settling vendettas against the ANC-led
government which some continue to claim is always representing the interests of
the working-class majority of this country. It would serve the interests of
factions born outside the student movement to have a youth that does not
question anything; for fear that we’ll question the glaringly lugubrious
contributions of those who claim to be genuine representatives of our plight.
But beyond that, it would serve this country that finds itself engulfed in a
state of defeatism to have young people volunteering themselves to abattoirs of
tyranny, where lies are claimed and easy victories are won. But young people do
not serve the interests of agents of falsification, indoctrination and induced
soporification and thus, revolt against the expectations imposed by these
people. We revolt against this for no other reason than that in everything
there is a season and a time for every purpose under the sun. And this is the
season and the time for young people to cut the umbilical cord that binds us to
the tyranny of our elders. This is a season and a time when we declare without
fear or favour that education is a site of struggle that cannot be diluted with
politics of men and women who start wars in parliaments and send us out to
fight and die in them.
REACTIONS TO THE STATEMENT RELEASED
BY SASCO
Three days
ago, on the 12th of June 2012, the president of the Republic of
South Afrika, the Honourable Jacob Gidleyihlekisa Zuma, announced a cabinet
reshuffle that saw Mr Mduduzi Manana, a member of the National Executive
Committee of the ANC Youth League and youngest Member of Parliament since 1994,
being appointed as the Deputy Minister of Higher Education and Training, a
position previously held by Ms Hlengiwe B Mkhize, who was shifted to the parallel
economic development portfolio. Mr Manana’s appointment sparked a lot of debate
in the country, with some sections of the populace declaring it a progressive
move and some strongly opposed to it. Those in the former category include the
Young Communist League of South Africa (YCLSA), led by Buti Manamela, which, in
a statement released on the 14th of June 2012, declared:
“The YCL would also like to extend our
congratulations to the newly
appointed Deputy Minister of Higher Education and Training, Cde Comfort
Mduduzi Manana, a distinguished youth activist and leader of our ally, the
ANCYL and a former chairperson of a YCL branch in the Gert Sibande District
in the Mpumalanga Province. All progressive youth formations should join
hands in welcoming this appointment by the state president.”
appointed Deputy Minister of Higher Education and Training, Cde Comfort
Mduduzi Manana, a distinguished youth activist and leader of our ally, the
ANCYL and a former chairperson of a YCL branch in the Gert Sibande District
in the Mpumalanga Province. All progressive youth formations should join
hands in welcoming this appointment by the state president.”
This
celebration was, of course, not shared by student formations. The South African
Democratic Student Movement (SADESMO), in a statement released n the 13th
of June 2012, had this to say:
“While SADESMO is totally disappointed by
the appointment of Mduduzi Manana as the Deputy Minister of Higher Education
and Training we are certainly not surprised…SADESMO believes that Manana lacks
the experience required for the grueling task of transforming the higher
education sector, which we view as vital if we want to make education and
training a top priority in South Africa…”
However, the
harshest criticism came from SASCO, the largest student movement in the
country, which did not attempt to mince its views in a statement released the
day before. SASCO, in a statement that informed the writing of this article,
had this to say about Manana’s appointment:
“Given our location in education and higher
education in particular we feel obliged to express our discomfort with the
appointment of Mduduzi Manana as deputy minister of Higher Education and
Training. SASCO is utterly dismayed,
taken aback, angry, flabbergasted, disappointed and annoyed at the appointment
of Mr Mdu Manana (who happens to be our colleague in the PYA as a leader of
the ANCYL) as the deputy minister of higher education and training. We do not
have any reason to believe that Mr Manana is up to the task of being a deputy
minister of such a complex and strategic department…” [Emphasis mine]
The
statement by SASCO, and in particular the quoted paragraph, was received with
mixed feelings, particularly on the social network platform where +/- 7.1
million South Africans converge daily (SA Digital Statistics, 2012). Criticism
also came from other student movements (even those who in principle shared the
views of SASCO but for reasons difficult to comprehend, felt it necessary to
join in on the scathing attacks), who too claimed that SASCO was being
reactionary and emotional in its response to Mr Manana’s appointment.
THE SASCO PERSPECTIVE: REACTIONARY OR
BITTER TRUTH?
As
indicated, according to those who have been spewing venom at the statement
released by SASCO, the organisation is settling scores with the ANC that is
allegedly marginalising it. Some have gone as far as to claim that SASCO is in
solidarity with the faction within the ANCYL that has been at war with the
president of the Republic and is using its influence within the Mass Democratic
Movement (MDM) to humiliate the president and the entire ANC. How such
conclusions can be drawn from the statement is yet another mystery
incomprehensible to some of us who believe that the statement is posing
questions that beg for critical analysis.
SASCO, in
its statement, attempts to explain the basis for its dissatisfaction about
Manana’s appointment:
“How on earth can our ANC led government
appoint such a person with no track record on issues related to education, let
alone higher education and further training in particular? We do not believe
that Mr Manana will help us in dealing with the plethora of challenges in the
higher education and further training sector. With all due respect to the
erroneously appointed deputy minister, we are not convinced that Mr Manana has
the capacity to diligently deliver in this department…”
At the risk
of inviting further attacks on SASCO, this statement shall be qualified.
Manana, who obtained a Bachelor of Arts degree in Political Science and
Sociology from the University of Kwa-Zulu Natal (UKZN), reportedly has a long
history of academic exclusions from various institutions, which he alleges were
informed by “ideological differences”. While this in itself is a matter that
need not be viewed in isolation from Manana’s contributions in the student
struggle (having started at 14 when he joined the Congress of South African
Students), it is a matter that begs for engagement. Indeed, academic
qualifications alone cannot be used as a determinant of a person’s capacity to
lead and deliver. However, in a ministry that already finds itself faced with a
“plethora of challenges” and in a country
that is in urgent need of the over-hauling of the education system in its
entirety, there is an vital need for qualified people with a clear vision to
formulate strategies on educational transformation. It stands to reason, thus,
that the most experienced and most qualified of people are the ones who ought
to be placed in the driving seat of this ministry. The education system in
South Afrika needs more than just political will and commitment from the
government and all stakeholders. It needs people who have experience dealing
with the on-going challenge of addressing the injustices of the past in the
higher education and training sector. Unfortunately, an undergraduate
qualification does not qualify as an indication of having dealt with this
challenge at a highest level and thus, inspires no confidence in young people
who are at the receiving end of the decay.
HIGHER EDUCATION AND TRAINING – THE
ROAD TO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT NOW A DREAM DEFERRED
It is very
easy to dismiss SASCO’s concerns as reactionary and emotional when one employs
a microscopic view to the underlying issues that are facing the country and
indeed, the entire Afrikan continent. However, when the retina is returned to
our eyes and we thoroughly dissect the implications of a higher education and
training sector in tatters, we will begin to understand how fatal a flaw it is
to appoint persons with questionable abilities to the education department.
South Afrika
is home to more than 58 mineral reserves in the world. 70% of them are in the
platinum group metals, 40% is gold and 70% is manganese (Department of Mineral
Resources 2009/2010 booklet). Historically, the economy of the country has been
rooted in the primary sector. This is the sector that has the industries
engaged in production or extraction of natural resources such as crops and ores
and because of South Afrika’s mineral wealth, this sector has been the main
driver of our economy. However, since the mid-1990s, economic
growth has been driven mainly by the tertiary sector - which includes wholesale
and retail trade, tourism and communications. As a result of this development, South Afrika is moving
away from being an industry-based to being a knowledge-based economy, an economy
which is directly based on the production, distribution and use of knowledge
and information. For this reason, higher education and training is the most
important sector in our country, for it is in it that producers of knowledge
and information are manufactured.
South
Afrika’s progress as a country and whatever policies and programmes we adopt,
must at all times be in line with the objective of addressing the triple
challenges of poverty, unemployment and unequal distribution of wealth, all
which are the chromatin network of a nucleus of historical colonial oppression
and the heinous legacy of apartheid. As such, it is vital that the first sector
that must have all energies employed into is the sector wherein the country’s
future generations is located, for it determines whether we become
beneficiaries of the apartheid legacy or agents of its annihilation. Such a
herculean task dare not be left in the hands of anyone but a dedicated,
committed and capacitated leader.
PROGRESSIVE DIALOGUE MEANS AN END TO
BLIND LOYALISM
Having
understood the context in which SASCO is raising its views, a context of
Afrikan development, it becomes opportunistic and fallacious to want to claim
that the organisation has any interests outside those of the future of the
youth in this country. It becomes dangerous even, to want to dismiss its views
as reactionary and emotional. We dare not allow agents of falsification,
soporification and indoctrination to convince us otherwise, lest we flirt with
our generation’s own demise.
It cannot be
debated that there is a need for South Afrika to engage honest introspection
that will lead to the removal of societal constructs that continue to hold us
hostage, one of them being blind loyalism and the other being philistinism.
These chains create limitations to our growth as a society, particularly for us
young people who stand to inherit this country. Our loyalty shall never be to
anything else but the ideal of a South Afrika in which those who are sent to
tertiary institutions emerge as critical thinkers as opposed to functional
illiterates as is the reality today. It should be to nothing else but the ideal
of a country wherein education is taken seriously by the government, wherein WE
are taken seriously by the government. So when debate is open, as it was with
SASCO’s statement, we must not only engage it critically, we must engage it
with honesty and an intention to gear it towards an Afrikan developmental
agenda. Failure to do so will spell the beginning of the end and the end of
what could be the beginning of a much needed mental revolution.
IZWE LETHU!
Malaika Wa
Azania (Daughter of the soil)
Minister of
Land Affairs 2033
**The author is not a member of
SASCO. She is a concerned first year student at a reactionary university
somewhere in the Eastern Cape. She writes in her own capacity.
Blog:
http://penandazanianrevolution.blogspot.com
Cellphone
number: 076 538 1557